Friday, December 28, 2012

PROPERTY GRAB

The Federal Reserve is a Private Company owned mostly by foreign interests and has no accountability to the US Congress. However, due to the outrage of the American people due to the published bailouts, Congress was able to perform a very limited audit in 2011 (first time ever) where we learned that the Fed made trillions of dollars in secret bailout loans to the big Wall Street banks during the last financial crisis. They even secretly loaned out hundreds of billions of dollars to foreign banks.

According to the results of the limited Fed audit mentioned above, a total of $16.1 trillion in secret loans were made by the Federal Reserve between December 1, 2007 and July 21, 2010. What’s worse is that these loans were at low interest and the banks turned around and used the money to buy more US securities. Effectively, the Fed gave away $16.1 Trillion of U.S. taxpayers $ so that their “Foreign Owners” could loan it back to them at a higher interest rate. The QE Infinity initiative is more of the same. The Fed is printing $40 billion per month and “buying” from banks below mortgage backed securities. What they would like the American people to believe is that the billions are being pumped back into the economy , ie. bolster the stock market, investments for small business, increased consumer credit, etc. In reality, these banks are using the money to buy T-Bills from the Fed. Basically the Fed is using this initiative in the biggest property grab in the history of the world with $ that are worth just the paper on which they are printed.

Here is a link to the list of illegal loans from page 131 of the audit report.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/60553686/GAO-Fed-Investigation#outer_page_144

Citigroup - $2.513 trillion
Morgan Stanley - $2.041 trillion
Merrill Lynch - $1.949 trillion
Bank of America - $1.344 trillion
Barclays PLC - $868 billion
Bear Sterns - $853 billion
Goldman Sachs - $814 billion
Royal Bank of Scotland - $541 billion
JP Morgan Chase - $391 billion
Deutsche Bank - $354 billion
UBS - $287 billion
Credit Suisse - $262 billion
Lehman Brothers - $183 billion
Bank of Scotland - $181 billion
BNP Paribas - $175 billion
Wells Fargo - $159 billion
Dexia - $159 billion
Wachovia - $142 billion
Dresdner Bank - $135 billion
Societe Generale - $124 billion
"All Other Borrowers" - $2.639 trillion

Nice business model if you can get away with it. Of course, you would have been hung if you tried it before 1913. 


The Federal Reserve Bank is the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on Americans. AND our local court systems have allowed this to happen.  (many times to and for their own personal gain)


 

Sunday, December 16, 2012

Deutsche Bank offices raided in carbon tax fraud probe

"Finally a little accountability, at least coming in other countries for this corrupt banking institution.  There is so much the American people do not know about this Deutsche Bank that absconded with billions of American dollars" and a whole lot more than that.



Saturday, December 15, 2012

Judge Rules Against Bank

Judge Rules Against Bank In Mortgage Modification Suit

 A recent ruling by a California appeals court clears the way for fraud charges against a lender that promised a loan modification but then foreclosed on the borrower.

The ruling throws into question the legality of hundreds of thousands of foreclosures.
Not only was the ruling a frontal assault on the empty promises made by servicers and banks, the case highlighted some despicable tactics often employed to force foreclosures.

Claudia Aceves, who originally sued U.S. Bank, NA in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, had taken out an $845,000 mortgage with Option One Mortgage Corporation. Option One later assigned the loan over to U.S. Bank.

The interest on Aceves’ adjustable rate note ratcheted up two years after it was entered into. By January 2008 she was falling behind on her payments. Shortly after March 26, 2008 when the loan’s servicer recorded a “Notice of Default and Election to Sell Under Deed of Trust,” Aceves filed for bankruptcy protection under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.

The bankruptcy filing imposed an automatic stay on the foreclosure proceedings.

After being offered financial help from her husband, Aceves converted her bankruptcy case from a chapter 7 to a chapter 13 case. Chapter 7, entitled “Liquidation,” would allow Aceves to discharge her debt on the home but not allow her to keep it. Chapter 13, entitled “Adjustment of Debts of an Individual with Regular Income,” has protections for homeowners that allows them to reinstate loan payments, pay arrearages, avoid foreclosure and keep their home.

U.S. Bank, upon learning of the original bankruptcy filing, filed a motion to lift the stay in order to execute a nonjudicial foreclosure and take the house back.

What happens next is indicative of the underhandedness of many servicers and banks.
Aceves’ bankruptcy attorney gets a letter from counsel to the loan’s servicer (American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.) that asks for permission to talk directly to Aceves to “explore Loss Mitigation possibilities.”  Aceves calls the servicer’s attorney because she wants a loan modification, which they are promising. But they tell her they can’t do anything or talk to her until their motion to lift the bankruptcy stay is granted.

So, Aceves doesn’t oppose the motion to lift the stay and further decides not to file the chapter 13 bankruptcy. All in the hopes that a modification would be negotiated.

On December 4, 2008 the stay is lifted. And, unbeknownst to Aceves, on December 9, 2008 U.S. Bank schedules the home for public auction one month later on January 9, 2009.

On December 10, 2008 Aceves sends in documents to American Home aiming to modify and reinstate the loan. Then on December 23, 2008 the servicer tells Aceves a “negotiator” will contact her on or before January 13, 2009.

Too bad for Aceves January 13, 2009 is going to be four days after her home is sold at auction. Which it is, with none other than U.S. Bank as the buyer.

But just to cover its promise to modify the loan, one day before the home is to be sold at auction the negotiator for American Home presents a unilateral offer to raise the loan balance from the original $845,000 to $965,926.22 and make the new monthly payments $7,200 as opposed to the original monthly payment amount of $4,857.09.

Aceves told them where to go.

She lost her home and sued. She lost when the Superior Court found that the defendants had met their obligations. The three-judge panel Appeals Court disagreed in its January 27, 2010 ruling.

The crux of the ruling, which in part relied on a decision in a previous case (Garcia v. World Savings, FSB) determined that “To be enforceable, a promise need only be ”’definite enough that a court can determine the scope of the duty.”’

Further illuminating its stance the Court said the point is, “simply whether U.S. Bank made and kept a promise to negotiate with Aceves, not whether the bank promised to make a loan, or more precisely, to modify a loan” is what matters.

As far as the servicer’s offer of a modification, the Appeals Court found that the promise to negotiate is “not based on a promise to make a unilateral offer but on a promise to negotiate in an attempt to reach a mutually agreeable loan modification.”

With all the unkept promises by banks and servicers to negotiate loan modifications that were never entertained, new litigation on top of all the foreclosure cases already being pursued is bound to cloud the future of real estate for the foreseeable future.

Source:  Timothy McCandless


Friday, November 30, 2012

CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY

Congressional Testimony: Vickie Barker to Bill Windsor of Lawless America.Interview introduces a foreclosure case heard by Judge Peter Billiou Twede in the Superior Court, County of Glenn, in the State of California.  The said property was basically given to Deutsche Bank and later sold to the highest bidder at an "alleged" legal foreclosure sale.  The property was purchased by Judge Peter Twede's family member, Michael Joseph Billiou III.  The property borders on Stoney Creek, a tributary of the Sacramento River just 2 miles from the native family's original village.




Congressional Testimony: Vickie Barker to Bill Windsor of Lawless America.

Lawless America...The Movie is all about exposing the fact that we now live in Lawless America. We no longer have laws that are enforced because judges do whatever they want to do. America has also become lawless because government officials are dishonest and/or corrupt.

The movie will expose corruption in every state. The Movie will focus on victims. Corrupt judges and corrupt government officials will be exposed, and we will confront a number of the crooks.

If anyone has ever questioned the story of a person who has expressed the view that they were a victim of the government or of judges, this movie will prove that the odds are that the corruption report was true. In fact, there are probably tens of millions of victims in the United States who never realized what happened to them.

One feature length documentary movie is being produced. It will be shown in theaters, on Netflix, Blockbuster, and other such video places, and the movie will be presented at the Sundance Film Festival and other film festivals.

In addition, videos will be produced for each state and for each type of corruption. Everyone interviewed for the film recorded a three-minute segment that will be done as testimony before Congress as well as a 30-60 minute on-camera interview with Bill Windsor, founder of LawlessAmerica.com and the revolutionary Party. The legislators in each state are receiving the testimony from those in their state, and the members of the U.S. House and Senate will receive all of the testimony nationwide.

Over 750 people were scheduled to be interviewed for the movie.

For more information, see www.LawlessAmerica.com -- www.YouTube.com/lawlessamerica -- www.facebook.com/lawlessamerica -- http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2337260/

Source: Congressional Testimony

Saturday, November 17, 2012

LAWYERS & JUDGES IN COLLUSION

“The once-honorable profession of law now fully functions as a bottom-line business, driven by greed and the pursuit of power and wealth, even shaping the laws of the United States outside the elected Congress and state legislatures.”
-- Justice John F. Molloy


The Fraternity: Lawyers and Judges in Collusion
JUSTICE JOHN F. MOLLOY
Justice John Fitzgerald Molloy When I began practicing law in 1946, justice was much simpler. I joined a small Tucson practice at a salary of $250 a month, excellent compensation for a beginning lawyer. There was no paralegal staff or expensive artwork on the walls.
In those days, the judicial system was straightforward and efficient. Decisions were handed down by judges who applied the law as outlined by the Constitution and state legislatures. Cases went to trial in a month or two, not years. In the courtroom, the focus was on uncovering and determining truth and fact.
I charged clients by what I was able to accomplish for them. The clock did not start ticking the minute they walked through the door.
Looking back
The legal profession has evolved dramatically during my 87 years. I am a second-generation lawyer from an Irish immigrant family that settled in Yuma. My father, who passed the Bar with a fifth-grade education, ended up arguing a case before the U.S. Supreme Court during his career.
The law changed dramatically during my years in the profession. For example, when I accepted my first appointment as a Pima County judge in 1957, I saw that lawyers expected me to act more as a referee than a judge. The county court I presided over resembled a gladiator arena, with dueling lawyers jockeying for points and one-upping each other with calculated and ingenuous briefs
That was just the beginning.
By the time I ended my 50-year career as a trial attorney, judge and president of southern Arizona's largest law firm, I no longer had confidence in the legal fraternity I had participated in and, yes, profited from.
I was the ultimate insider, but as I looked back, I felt I had to write a book about serious issues in the legal profession and the implications for clients and society as a whole. The Fraternity: Lawyers and Judges in Collusion was 10 years in the making and has become my call to action for legal reform.
Disturbing evolution
Our Constitution intended that only elected lawmakers be permitted to create law.
Yet judges create their own law in the judicial system based on their own opinions and rulings. It's called case law, and it is churned out daily through the rulings of judges. When a judge hands down a ruling and that ruling survives appeal with the next tier of judges, it then becomes case law, or legal precedent. This now happens so consistently that we've become more subject to the case rulings of judges rather than to laws made by the lawmaking bodies outlined in our Constitution.
This case-law system is a constitutional nightmare because it continuously modifies constitutional intent. For lawyers, however, it creates endless business opportunities. That's because case law is technically complicated and requires a lawyer's expertise to guide and move you through the system. The judicial system may begin with enacted laws, but the variations that result from a judge's application of case law all too often change the ultimate meaning.
Lawyer domination
When a lawyer puts on a robe and takes the bench, he or she is called a judge. But in reality, when judges look down from the bench they are lawyers looking upon fellow members of their fraternity. In any other area of the free-enterprise system, this would be seen as a conflict of interest.
When a lawyer takes an oath as a judge, it merely enhances the ruling class of lawyers and judges. First of all, in Maricopa and Pima counties, judges are not elected but nominated by committees of lawyers, along with concerned citizens. How can they be expected not to be beholden to those who elevated them to the bench?
When they leave the bench, many return to large and successful law firms that leverage their names and relationships.
Business of law
The concept of "time" has been converted into enormous revenue for lawyers. The profession has adopted elaborate systems where clients are billed for a lawyer's time in six-minute increments. The paralegal profession is another brainchild of the fraternity, created as an additional tracking and revenue center. High powered firms have departmentalized their services into separate profit centers for probate and trusts, trial, commercial, and so forth.
The once-honorable profession of law now fully functions as a bottom-line business, driven by greed and the pursuit of power and wealth, even shaping the laws of the United States outside the elected Congress and state legislatures.
Bureaucratic design
Today the skill and gamesmanship of lawyers, not the truth, often determine the outcome of a case. And we lawyers love it. All the tools are there to obscure and confound. The system's process of discovery and the exclusionary rule often work to keep vital information off-limits to jurors and make cases so convoluted and complex that only lawyers and judges understand them.
The net effect has been to increase our need for lawyers, create more work for them, clog the courts and ensure that most cases never go to trial and are, instead, plea-bargained and compromised. All the while the clock is ticking, and the monster is being fed.
The sullying of American law has resulted in a fountain of money for law professionals while the common people, who are increasingly affected by lawyer-driven changes and an expensive, self-serving bureaucracy, are left confused and ill-served.
Today, it is estimated that 70 percent of low-to-middle-income citizens can no longer afford the cost of justice in America. What would our Founding Fathers think?
This devolution of lawmaking by the judiciary has been subtle, taking place incrementally over decades. But today, it's engrained in our legal system, and few even question it. But the result is clear. Individuals can no longer participate in the legal system.
It has become too complex and too expensive, all the while feeding our dependency on lawyers.
By complicating the law, lawyers have achieved the ultimate job security. Gone are the days when American courts functioned to serve justice simply and swiftly.
It is estimated that 95 million legal actions now pass through the courts annually, and the time and expense for a plaintiff or defendant in our legal system can be absolutely overwhelming.
Surely it's time to question what has happened to our justice system and to wonder if it is possible to return to a system that truly does protect us from wrongs.

A lawyer from Tuscon, Arizona, John Fitzgerald Molloy (b. 1917) was elected to the Superior Court bench where he served for seven years as both a juvenile court and trial bench judge.  He subsequently was elected to the Court of Appeals where he authored over 300 appellate opinions, including the final Miranda decision for the Arizona Supreme Court.  During that period, he also served as president of the Arizona Judge's Association.  After 12 years, Molloy returned to private practice to become president of the largest law firm in southern Arizona.  His book has received widespread praise for its candor and disquieting truths.  (Photo courtesy of Paragon House)
Copyright 2004, Paragon House




From an Internet released preview of the book by John Fitzgerald Molloy, The Fraternity: Lawyers and Judges in Collusion, Paragon House, St. Paul, Minnesota, 2004.  Reprinted in accordance with the "fair use" provision of Title 17 U.S.C. § 107 for a non-profit educational purpose.


Source:  Tulane Link

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

What is JURY NULLIFICATION

Jury Nullification: The Evolution of a Doctrine

by Clay S. Conrad

What Everyone Should Know About the Powers of the Jury 
 
Central to the history of trial by jury is the right of jurors to vote "not guilty" if the law is unjust or unjustly applied. When jurors acquit a factually guilty defendant, we say that the jury "nullified" the law. The Founding Fathers believed that juries in criminal trials had a role to play as the "conscience of the community," and relied on juries' "nullifying" to hold the government to the principles of the Constitution. Yet over the last century and a half, this power of jurors has been derided and ignored by American courts, to the point that today few jurors are aware that an important part of their role is, in the words of the Supreme Court, to "prevent oppression by the government." 

Chapter One
Introduction

"Trust in the jury is, after all, one of the cornerstones of our entire criminal jurisprudence, and if that trust is without foundation we must re-examine a great deal more than just the nullification doctrine." Judge David L. Bazelon

There may be no feature more distinctive of American legal culture than the criminal trial jury. Americans have a deep and stubborn devotion to the belief that the guilt or innocence of a person accused of crime can only be judged fairly by a "jury of his peers." This notion is a particularly American one, although it was inherited from English common law during the Colonial era.

What Jury Independence Is All About

Jury independence is a simple doctrine, although in individual applications it has occasionally had dramatic and wide-ranging implications. The doctrine states that jurors in criminal trials have the right to refuse to convict if they believe that a conviction would be in some way unjust. 

If jurors believe enforcing the law in a specific case would cause an injustice, it is their prerogative to acquit. If they believe a law is unjust, or misapplied, or that it never was, or never should have been, intended to cover a case such as the one they are facing, it is their duty to see justice done.


Published by Carolina Academic Press.

Clay S. Conrad is an attorney in private practice in Houston, Texas.


Source: http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/jurynul3.htm

JURY NULLIFICATION

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Friday, October 12, 2012

FRAUD AND TREASON - WASHINGTON

Seattle, Washington State, America
September 20, 2012
Criminal/civil charges have been filed with referenced evidentiary weblinks against officials of the Washington State corporate government, as well as media corporations operating in Washington State, for perpetrating/enabling systemic financial/constititutional fraud and treason.

The allegations in these legal actions specifically expose what has been called the CAFR scam, with its implications of fraudulent unnecessary budget cuts to government services at all levels of government all across America as a result of theft by the private Federal Reserve System. These are accompanied by related allegations that the Washington State Constitution of 1889, as well as the present US corporate government, are fraudulent, and that failure to disclose this constitutes treason on the part of state corporate government/media officials.

These criminal/civil charges have been filed with the Federal Grand Jury of the Ninth District Court, the FBI, the Offices of the King County Sheriff, and that of the Seattle Chief of Police and Seattle City Prosecutor here in Seattle . They have also been filed in the state capital of Olympia/Thurston County with the Offices of the Thurston County Sherriff, the Thurston County Prosecutor, the Olympia Chief of Police and the Olympia City Prosecutor.

Copies of these charges’ Proofs of Filing can be seen below. All civil/criminal charges filed at the local level were hand-delivered, with receipts signed at the front desk for documentation of filing. Those filed at the federal level even if local, as well as those filed at a distance in the Washington State capital of Olympia were filed via certified mail.

Those charges filed with the Federal Grand Jury were filed without return receipt to better ensure that they would reach the Foreperson without the interposition of possibly compromised court clerks or US attorneys; accordingly, a copy of the screen shot from the delivery tracking portion of the US Postal Service website has been scanned to show such proper filing, with delivery on September 10, 2012.

It should be mentioned that two attempts to file these charges with the King County Prosecutor’s Office were unsuccessful. In both instances, clerks connected with this office rejected the packet of charges. They stated that sovereign citizens did not have the right to file criminal charges, and that all civil charges against the state need to be filed as a civil lawsuit at the sovereign citizen’s expense — now $400 — with the district court to be decided by state corporate government-appointed judges. This clearly no-win proposition for the plaintiff was immediately rejected by this plaintiff.
All of the filings of these charges been done in such a way to ensure as well as is possible that appropriate action might be taken on the part of law enforcement/judicial agencies located in Washington State, and that if it is not, that such derogation of duty will become immediately and publicly apparent, as seen in the paragraph above concerning Proof of Public Disservice by the King County Prosecutor’s Office.

Since the term “United States of America” is now often considered to denote the bank cartel-controlled federal government corporation, many geopolitically savvy sovereign citizens prefer being called “Americans” and their country “America”, even though we share the North American continent with other nations. This dichotomy illustrates the gravity of the issues being discovered in this document, and is the reason that the terms ” America ” and “Americans” are herein being used instead of ” USA ” and ” US citizens” to denote our nation and its legitimate inhabitants.

Media corporations operating in Washington State are, possibly for the first time in recorded history, included in such a legal action. It finally needs to be publicly acknowledged and acted upon that corporate media distortions and omissions in reporting the news as agreed upon in their corporate charters have long enabled such ongoing criminal activity on the part of corrupt corporate government officials in this state and in others throughout the world. This was also done to remind both media corporations and the public that, besides prosecution of their executives, corporate charters can be legally rescinded as a form of capital punishment for capitalist corporate entities whenever their corporate charters are repeatedly and reprehensibly violated, as many have been in recent memory.

It is hoped that these public legal actions will help create a template by which empowered sovereign citizens everywhere can draft their own like public legal actions based on their own situations, research and laws, and they, like sovereign citizens in Washington State, can themselves publicly file these charges with their own law enforcement agencies to help expose and systemically extirpate this ancient ongoing theft of planetary resources.

Other sovereign citizens of Washington State are cordially invited to print out these charges and file them with their own local law enforcement officials, as well as forward them to their elected representatives, to Washington State media and to their fellow citizens, so that general knowledge of such systemic evil and what can successfully eliminate it can rapidly be increased.
For it is only by such peaceful but effective means that the satanic international bank-based corporate crime syndicate that presently controls most of the governments of this planet will ultimately and forever be defeated.

——————————————————————————–
WCSS 9-5-12.doc
CRIMINAL/CIVIL CHARGES AGAINST WASHINGTON STATE CORPORATE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS/MEDIA CORPORATIONS OPERATING IN WASHINGTON STATE FOR SYSTEMIC FINANCIAL/CONSTITUTIONAL FRAUD AND TREASON

Against the following Washington State corporate government officials:

Governor Christine Gregoire, Treasurer James McIntire, Attorney General Robert McKenna, Washington State Investment Board Legislature Liaison Rep. Sharon Tomiko-Santos, Budget Director Martin Brown, President of the Senate Lisa Brown, Co-Chairmen of the Senate Ways and Means Committee, Senators Edward Murray and Joseph Zarelli, Speaker of the House Frank Chopp and Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee Ross Hunter, as well as top management of mainstream/alleged alternative media corporations operating in Washington State, the following criminal/civil charges are alleged:

1. Systemic Ongoing Financial Fraud Against the People of Washington State

1.01 That the abovementioned Washington State corporate government officials and their predecessors in office, as well as mainstream/alleged alternative media corporations operating in Washington State have knowingly and repeatedly concealed the existence of approximately two-thirds of state monies shown in the Washington State Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, (CAFR) while misrepresenting the remaining one-third of these monies as the entire “state budget” since at least the mid-1940s;

Websites/links on CAFRs/CAFR Scam
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comprehensive_annual_financial_report
www.cafrman.com www.cafr1.com
www.webofdebt.com/articles/mysterious_cafrs.php
http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/carl-herman
www.comprehensiveannualfinancialreport.com

1.02 That Washington State corporate government officials have invested the two-thirds of state monies concealed in the CAFR in institutional corporate Wall Street investments, rather than in investments that would directly benefit the people of Washington State, such as investments in small businesses with the much greater amount of employment, personal prosperity and government tax revenues they would provide, in infrastructure maintenance that would provide widespread employment as well as for the general welfare, or in a public state bank, which, as in the State of North Dakota since 1919, would eliminate state economic downturns altogether;

Websites on Pubic Banking
www.wapublicbankproject.org www.publicbanking.org www.webofdebt.com

1.03. That, next to institutional investments in the US government corporation’s increasingly devalued financial instruments — the collateral damage from the recently revealed LIBOR scandal (LIBOR=London Interbank Offered Rate or “LIBER” (Latin for “Unregulated”) —
http://www.businessinsider.com/infographic-the-libor-scandal-explained-2012-7
the state corporate government’s largest investments are in the corrupt international banking cartel directly responsible for the global depression of 2008, in which the global economy, as well as that of Washington State presently remain;

1.04 That at least eighty-five percent of the state’s investments are in foreign governmental or quasi-governmental entities and transnational corporations; few of them are in any entity located within Washington State , or in any headquartered in America ;

1.05 That of these transnational corporate Wall Street investments, a disproportionate number are in predatory transnational corporations other than the predatory transnational banks, in which the majority of the people of Washington State, if sufficiently informed, would not want their money invested as a matter of ethical and/or environmental principles; this includes institutional investments in BP, Shell, Keystone XL, Dow Chemical, Massey Energy, Cargill and Monsanto;

1.06 That the Washington State government has a grave conflict of interest by aggressively promoting by both executive order and legislation the products of industries in which they have large investments, such as the pharmaceutical cartel and its bioweaponized vaccines, in which it has institutional investments of over one-half billion dollars;

Why the Washington State Government Is a Ruthless Vaccine Pusher
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/8367537-why-the-washington-state-government-is-a-ruthless-vaccine-pusher

1.07 That the Washington State government has a grave conflict of interest by failing to proportionately tax those Washington State-located transnational corporations in which it is heavily invested and/or whose favor they wish to obtain;

1.08 That the Washington State government has a grave conflict of interest by investing in foreign manufacturing competitors while failing to invest in those which would provide manufacturing employment and infrastructure for the people of Washington State;

1.09 That the Washington State Investment Board (WSIB) — the financial arm of the Washington State Legislature headed by the state treasurer — employs financial advisors of questionable competence and integrity, including accused war criminal former US Secretary of State Madeline Albright and the infamously corrupt investment firm of Goldman Sachs — never consulting with those who offer any alternative economic perspectives and solutions, including those employed within the Washington State government itself;

1.10 That the WSIB plotted in the spring of 2006 to alter the Washington State Constitution so that the fulsome Washington State Education Fund — derived from regular fees paid by the state’s resource extraction industries of mining, fishing and lumbering — could be used in the future for institutional corporate Wall Street investments, rather than as before being kept safely in trust;
1.11 That to achieve this diversion of state funds in trust, the WSIB quietly placed on the state ballot Issue 4215, which proposed an amendment to the Washington State Constitution allowing the state higher education funds to be used in corporate Wall Street investments;

1.12 That the majority of voters in Washington State, deliberately kept ill-informed by state corporate government officials and mainstream/alleged alternative media corporations operating in Washington State, passed this stealth measure by a large margin in November 2006, to be ratified as a constitutional amendment by the state legislature in January 2007;

2006 Washington State Voters Guide Writeup on State Issue 4215
http://vote.wa.gov/Elections/Measure2007.aspx?a=4215&c=7

1.13 That, since early 2004, the WSIB has deliberately invested a large portion of its institutional investment portfolio in derivatives and credit default options (CDOs), the most opaque, unstable investment instruments imaginable;

1.14 That, due to the corporate bailouts and banking cartel-engineered depression of 2008, as well as the WSIB’s prodigal, imprudent corporate Wall Street investments, the Washington State Education Fund now has been depleted by half, due to the resulting devaluation of institutionally invested stocks and bonds;

1.15 This has served to radically increase tuition and student loan indebtedness while radically decreasing the availability and quality of higher education to the people of Washington State ;
1.16 That all of this occurred less than two years after Issue 4215 was stealthily and deceptively introduced by the WSIB, passed by the majority of voters, and its related constitutional amendment approved by their state legislators;

1.17 That the amount of the people’s money deliberately being squandered in volatile institutional corporate Wall Street investments is at least eighty times the amount of the alleged state budget deficit of approximately $1 billion, which this invested money could have easily eliminated if used responsibly;

1.18 That the abovecited Washington State officials continually demand increasingly exorbitant taxation and licensing fees from the already deliberately financially stressed people of this state;

1.19 That they do this is while being entrusted with massive amounts of the people’s money, yet knowingly and willfully withholding and purloining it for the benefit of the private international banking cartel and those who secretly control it;

1.20 That the immediate motive for this treasonous fraud perpetrated by the abovecited Washington State corporate government officials and their predecessors in office and mainstream/alleged alternative media corporations operating in Washington State against the people of this state has been their greed for both wealth and power, accepting lucrative bribes, kickbacks, campaign contributions, loans and lucrative advertising contracts, as well as enhanced monies from personal investments from the corrupt international banking cartel and other corrupt transnational corporations;

1.21 That the actual underlying motive of these corporate state government officials’/media corporations’ corporate contributors has been, besides huge profits, the financial destruction and enslavement of the people of this state;

1.22 That therefore the Washington State corporate government budget and its budget deficit are now, and have been since at least the mid-1940s, fraudulent;

1.23 And therefore all budget cuts made on the pretext of this fraudulent state budget deficit that now threaten the general welfare — including the health and wellbeing of the disabled and disenfranchised, the cutting of public library, public transportation and public education services and those budget cuts which threaten to privatize all of the Washington state park system — are therefore criminal.

Websites/links Providing Evidence of the CAFR Scam in the Washington State Corporate Government, Including the Washington State Investment Board’s CAFR With Analysis, and Similar Recent Budgetary Fraud Exposed in the California State Parks System
http://nowisthetime.us www.sib.wa.gov
The Spokane Spokesman/Seattle Times Columnist: Washington State Parks Now on Their Own
http://spokesman.com/stories/2012/aug/04/state-parks-on-their-own
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/dannywestneat/2018850731_danny05.html

CAFR Scam Exposed: California State Parks Department Had $54 million While Asking for Park Volunteers and Cutting Park Services
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-state-parks-20120721,0,2383546,full.story

2. Deliberate Denial of Remedy, Indicating Complicity in Criminal Conspiracy

2.01 That the above-cited Washington State corporate government officials and their predecessors in office, as well as mainstream/alleged alternative media corporations operating in Washington State, have failed repeatedly to disclose publicly that the figures contained in the Washington State Annual Comprehensive Financial Report — not those in what they claim as the annual budgetary document — are the most accurate declaration of actual state corporate government funds;

2.02 That the abovecited Washington State corporate government officials and their predecessors in office have failed to provide to the public clear comprehensive summaries of the fraudulent, unnecessary budget cuts made to each and every state cabinet department and its programs to obfuscate their negative impact on the general welfare of this state; and the abovecited mainstream/alleged alternative media corporations operating in Washington State have failed to demand and report on such essential information;

2.03 That the WSIB has deliberately invested the people’s money in volatile corporate Wall Street investments knowing that it would never be returned to them, not only because their inherent risk, but because of ongoing fraudulent and insidious federal corporate confiscation of these funds, upon which the mainstream/alleged alternative media corporations operating in this state, as well as state corporate government officials, have continually refused to report to duly inform the public;

2.04 That all individual and institutional investments, after being registered by a stock broker with the Depository Transaction Clearing Center (DTCC) — an obscure subsidiary of the privately owned Federal Reserve System doing business as (dba) the sardonically named Cede Inc. — become the tacitly ceded property of Cede Inc., with the people thereby rendered mere “beneficiaries” rather than owners, of their own investments;

2.05 That thereafter the people can be denied access to the dividends of these institutional investments at any time by the Federal Reserve corporation and those who secretly control this privately owned alien entity;

Who Really Owns Your Money: The Depository Trust Clearing Corporation
www.dtcc.com
http://yourmortgageoryourlife.wordpress.com/2008/09/30/who-really-owns-your-money-part-one-the-depository-trust-clearing-corporation/

Here Is Where Some of the Washington State Corporate Government’s Institutional Investments of the People’s Money Actually Went After It Was Stolen by the Federal Reserve Through the DTCC:
Final Federal Reserve Audit Results Posted on September 4, 2012:

$16 Trillion Stolen from the American People to Enrich the International Banking Cartel
ittp://www.pakalertpress.com/first-audit-results-in-the-federal-reserves-nealy-100-year-history-were-posted-today-they-are-startaling

Exhaustive Study Finds Globalists Hiding $32 Trillion in Secret Off-Shore Bank Accounts
http://www.democracynow.org/2012/7/31/exhaustive_study_finds_global_elite_hiding

2.06 That the above-cited Washington State corporate government officials and their predecessors in office, as well as the mainstream/alleged alternative media corporations operating in this state have repeatedly failed to enact/accurately report historically proven remedies to the state budget deficit — such as proportionate corporate taxation, state investment in small business, physical/technical infrastructure and a public state bank, while utilizing prudent trusts and investment instruments — although being fully and repeatedly informed of the benefits of these remedies;

2.07 That all of the above constitutes deliberate denial of remedy and complicity in criminal conspiracy.

3. Ongoing Systemic Constitutional Fraud Against the People of Washington State Tantamount to Treason

3.01 That the abovecited Washington State corporate government officials and their predecessors in office, as well as the mainstream/alleged alternative media corporations operating in Washington State have failed both to reveal and remediate the fact that the present Washington State Constitution of 1889 — latest amended by state investments-related Issue 4215 in 2006 — is fraudulent, automatically rendering invalid all legislation and executive orders enacted by officers of the current spurious state government corporation, specifically those dealing with its governmental financial system;

3.02 That the original state constitution enacted via due process by the people of Washington State in 1878 is indeed the actual Washington State Constitution, but was treasonously confiscated and held hostage by the banking cartel-controlled United States Corporation of the District of Columbia (DC) through the calculated failure of the US Congress to act upon it for eleven years until it was quietly replaced by the one of 1889 that had been drafted and enacted by spurious means;

3.03 That this banking cartel-controlled federal corporation had quietly been put in place during the upheaval of the cartel-engineered American Civil War/Reconstruction Period, during which the common-law US Constitution and Bill of Rights was stealthily replaced by unconstitutional statutory/commercial law and executive orders under the rubric of President Abraham Lincoln’s declaration of martial law at the beginning of the American Civil War in 1861 that has continued unrescinded to this day;

3.04 That the Washington DC-based United States Corporation then proceeded by various methods to subvert sovereign US states into becoming corporate subsidiaries of the federal US corporation;

3.05 That one of the methods used was for the de facto board of directors of the federal United States Corporation, the US Congress, to refuse to ratify any lawfully enacted state constitution under the ruse of political partisanship unless that new state constitution incorporated the treasonous agenda of the federal government corporation;

3.06 That such an example is the fraudulent Washington State Constitution of 1889, which diverged from the original of 1878, insofar as it omitted any acknowledgement of sovereign state citizenship and of alloidial personal property rights that the banking cartel-controlled US Corporation ultimately intends to eliminate in America and throughout the world;

3.07 That this has resulted in American government at all levels — including that of Washington State — being since the Civil War the public enabler/enforcer of the subversive, sinister agenda of the international banking cartel and those who secretly control it, to the extreme detriment of the people of this state and of this nation;

3.08 That concerning all of the abovecited treason and its potential remedies, the abovecited Washington State corporate government officials and the mainstream/alleged alternative media corporations operating in Washington State have failed in their duty to even minimally inform the public.

The Fraudulent Washington State Constitution and Its Relationship to the International Banking Cartel’s Clandestine Control of the US Government Since At Least 1861
Articles on the History of the Fraudulent Washington State Constitution
http://proliberty.com/observer/20001102.html
http://freedomrequireswork.org/public_access/washington/wash_const.html
The International Banking Cartel’s Takeover of the US Government Using the Civil War
www.famguardian.org/Subjects/Freedom/…/Sins_022810.pdf
http://newtomorrow.us
Historic Quotations Concerning US/Global Corporate Government
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/quotes/index.htm

Wherefore:
The above cited Washington State corporate government officials and their surviving predecessors in office, as well as the top management of mainstream/alleged alternative media corporations operating in Washington State need to be summarily investigated, and then potentially arrested and prosecuted for criminal financial/constitutional fraud and treason against the people of this state;

And the people of Washington State need publicly to acknowledge and examine their own complicity in the criminal and treasonous actions/inaction of their abovecited state corporate government officials and their predecessors in office, as well as of the mainstream/alleged alternative media corporations operating in Washington State, through their own self-absorbed denial of, and disinterest in, the long-corrupted governmental and public information systems of this state and of this nation.
I hereby declare that all of the above statements are, to the best of my knowledge, true and accurate.
____________________________________ ___________________________
Rebecca Em Campbell-Plaintiff Date
Seattle, Washington State America
rebeccaphb@yahoo.com

Source:  Now Is The Time

FRAUD - U.S. Sues Wells Fargo Bank

(Reuters) - The U.S. government filed a civil mortgage fraud lawsuit on Tuesday against Wells Fargo & Co, the latest legal volley against big banks for their lending during the housing boom.

The complaint, brought by the U.S. Attorney in Manhattan, seeks damages and civil penalties from Wells Fargo for more than 10 years of alleged misconduct related to government-insured Federal Housing Administration loans.

The lawsuit alleges the FHA paid hundreds of millions of dollars on insurance claims on thousands of defaulted mortgages as a result of false certifications by Wells Fargo, the fourth-biggest U.S. bank as measured by assets.

"As the complaint alleges, yet another major bank has engaged in a longstanding and reckless trifecta of deficient training, deficient underwriting and deficient disclosure, all while relying on the convenient backstop of government insurance," said Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara.

Wells, the largest U.S. mortgage lender, denied the allegations and said in a statement it believes it acted in good faith and in compliance with FHA and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development rules. The bank said many of the allegations have been previously addressed with HUD and added that its FHA delinquency rates have been as low as half the industry average.

In a regulatory filing in August, the bank said it was being investigated for possible violations of laws and regulations relating to mortgage origination practices, including FHA loans. Wells said it will vigorously defend itself against the suit.

Bharara's office has brought similar cases in the past few years, including one against Citigroup Inc unit CitiMortgage Inc, which settled the case for $158.3 million in February, and against Deutsche Bank, which paid $202.3 million in May to resolve its case.

The U.S. Attorney's office in Brooklyn brought the biggest such case, against Bank of America Corp's Countrywide unit, which agreed in February to pay $1 billion to resolve the allegations.
The Wells Fargo case is brought under the False Claims Act, which provides penalties for fraud against the government, and under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act, or FIRREA for short, a little-used statute that has grown in popularity in the past year.

The law requires a lower burden of proof than criminal charges, has a longer statute of limitations than other financial laws and potentially could bring big fines.

A civil fraud unit that Bharara created in March 2010 filed its first lawsuit under FIRREA in December of that year.

DAMAGES AND PENALTIES

At issue In Tuesday's suit are loans Wells Fargo made through a program that allows banks to originate, underwrite and certify mortgages for FHA insurance, according to the complaint. Under the so-called Direct Endorsement Lender program, neither the FHA nor HUD reviews a loan before it is approved for FHA insurance, but lenders are supposed to follow program rules.

Between May 2001 and October 2005, according to the complaint, Wells certified more than 100,000 loans for FHA insurance, even though the bank knew its underwriters had failed to verify information that was directly related to the borrower's ability to make payments.

"The extreme poor quality of Wells Fargo's loans was a function of management's singular focus on increasing the volume of FHA originations (and the bank's profits), rather than the quality of the loans being originated," the complaint said.

The bank also failed to properly train its staff, hired temporary workers and paid improper bonuses to its underwriters to encourage them to approve as many loans as possible, the complaint said.

During a 7-month stretch in 2002, at least 42 percent of the bank's FHA loans failed to actual qualify for the insurance they were submitted for, even though the bank's internal benchmark for such violations was set at 5 percent.

Wells also kept its defective loans secret from HUD, the complaint said. From January 2002 to December 2010, the bank internally identified more than 6,000 "materially deficient" loans, including 3,000 that had defaulted in the first six months, but did not comply with its self-reporting obligations, the complaint said.

Prior to October 2005, the bank did not self-report a single bad loan, and the inadequate reporting continued even after a HUD inquiry that year, the suit states. All told, from 2002 through 2010 the bank self-reported only 238 loans, according to the complaint.

Some of the mortgages Wells Fargo suspected of fraud but declined to report to HUD include loans it separately reported as suspicious activity to the U.S. Treasury Department, according to the suit.
The complaint seeks treble damages and penalties for hundreds of millions of dollars in insurance claims already paid to Wells Fargo, as well as penalties on claims HUD may pay in the future.

Citi, in its settlement, paid $158 million to resolve allegations that a "substantial percentage" of around $200 million in insurance claims failed to meet FHA requirements.

The Wells Fargo complaint also includes specific allegations that the lender failed to report another $190 million in loans it should have flagged as potentially problematic to HUD, which potentially adds to any eventual payout from the bank.

The lawsuit adds to the growing number of civil cases the government has filed targeting conduct that allegedly contributed to the financial crisis.

The Justice Department has indicted few individuals and institutions on criminal charges for roles in the collapse, and officials have said prosecutors determined much of the conduct amounted to greed but not crimes.

A joint federal-state task force set up earlier this year to continue to probe conduct tied to the 2007-2009 crisis has also acknowledged the bulk of its inquiries are under civil law.

(Reporting by Rick Rothacker in Charlotte, N.C. and Aruna Viswanatha in Washington; Editing by Matthew Lewis and Tim Dobbyn)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/u-files-mortgage-fraud-lawsuit-against-wells-fargo-202947891--finance.html

TRIAL BY JURY

Saturday, June 16, 2012

Deutsche Bank v Sarina Nelson

NOTE: This entire case revolved around Deutsche Bank instead of all the others that have participated in the illegal foreclosure of our over 100 year old family farm.  Deutsche Bank had bought the paper to the house/property at an illegal foreclosure sale (non-existent et al.) allegedly held in Glenn County California.

Those that perpetrated the fraud from the beginning through the end of the alleged sale are addressed in the following court documents presented to the Glenn County Court.  Copies of the audio transcripts are available, except for the last one in which Judge Peter Billiou Twede dismissed the action taken against Deutsche Bank et al.  This audio should still be available at the Glenn County Court House records.

SPECIAL NOTE:  The property was given to Deutsche Bank by Judge Peter Billiou Twede.  Deutsche Bank then sold the property at a local "alleged legal" auction to the highest bidder.  The property was purchased at the auction by Judge Peter Billiou Twede's relative Michael Joseph Billiou III.  Michael Joseph Billiou the THIRD (III) has now taken illegal possession and is currently obstructing and redirecting the natural Stoney Creek.

Michael Joseph Billiou the III has now taken control of the natural water way and has been digging gravel and illegally changing the natural habitat and natural eco-system which is not in compliance with the rules and regulations protecting these natural water ways, a direct tributary to the Sacramento River.  

The actions in court are better explained through the actual court documents themselves and these follow here:

After the initial Unlawful Detainer service the defendent filed the following DEMUR: (actual filed copy reads the same and of course includes the exhibits.  The copy of that filed in the court has not been scanned but is available for scanning and presentation for review as needed.)

Case No.: 10NUD00320

DEMURRER OF SARINA ANN NELSON TO THE UNLAWFUL DETAINER COMPLAINT OF DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE OF THE INDYMAC IMSC MORTGAGE CO.


Judge overruled the Demur.  An Answer was filed on 12/27/10:

 Answer to Unlawful Detainer - 12-27-10
 Affirmative Defense - 12-28-10


Attempted to contact many Attorneys in the area but most were out of town for the holidays, those that weren't did not have their offices open and couldn't respond until after the first of the year.  We were able to find Helen Duree who agreed to help us move ahead in filing a trial brief after reviewing the specifics of the case.

Trial Brief Filed - 01-24-11

PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO SET ASIDE 
JUDGMENT ENTERED FEBRUARY 4, 2011 
AS VOID FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION; 
DECLARATION OF ROSEMARY NGUYEN 
IN SUPPORT THEREOF - 06-06-11

Response to Plaintiff's Opposition To Set Aside 
Judgement Entered February 4, 2011 As Void For 
Lack Of Jurisdiction; Declaration of Rosemary 
Nguyen In Support Thereof - 06-06-11



___________________________________________________________________________

From Glenn County Court Online Database:

Case Information
Case Number: 10NUD00320
Case Title: DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONA VS NELSON, SARINA ANN
Case Type: UNLAWFUL DETAINER * RESIDENTIA
Filing Date: 10/08/10
Disposition Date: 01/24/11

JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF(S)


Parties
Name Type Attorney
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY PLAINTIFF ROUTH CRABTREE OLSEN, P.S.
NELSON, SARINA ANN DEFENDANT PRO PER
ALL OCCUPANTS ALL OCCUPANTS


Actions
Date Action Description
06/03/11 D'S POS RE: RESPONSE TO P'S OPPOSITION BY FAX
  ON 6/03/11 AS TO DEFENDANT
06/03/11 D'S RESPONSE TO PLTF'S OPPOSITION TO SET
  ASIDE JUDGMENT
05/27/11 P'S OPPOSITION TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT ENTERED
  2/4/11
05/10/11 CRT'S ORDER AFTER HEARING HELD ON 5/02/2011
  *POS ATTACHED*
05/10/11 CRT'S MINUTE ORDER IN RE: PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST
  FOR STATEMENT OF DECISION
05/10/11 CRT'S OSC RE: SET ASIDE JUDGMENT ENTERED 2/4/11
  FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION *HRG SET 6/06/11*
04/29/11 DEFT'S RESPONSE TO PLNTF'S OPPOSITION TO
  DEFT'S EXPARTE APP FOR STAY OF ENF OF JUDG
04/29/11 PROOF OF SERVICE BY FAX TO ROSEMARY NGUYEN ON
  4/20/2011
04/27/11 PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS EX PARTE
  APP FOR STAY OF ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT
04/11/11 PRF OF SVC AS TO EX PARTE APPLICATION
  MLD 4/11/11 SHAHED SHAHANDEH DEUTSCHE BANK
04/11/11 ORDER ON EXPARTE APPLICATION OF ENFORCEMENT OF
  JUDGMENT AND WRIT OF POSSESSION
04/11/11 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS
04/08/11 D'S EX PARTE MOTION/APPLICATION FOR
  STAY OF EXECUTION
02/17/11 PRF OF SVC AS TO PLAINTIFF BY MAIL ON 02/17/11
  AS TO EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR STAY OF JUDGME
02/16/11 SUBSTITUTION OF ATTY; NEW: SELF REPRESENTED
  OLD: HELEN DUREE
02/16/11 DECLARATION RE: NOTICE OF EX PARTE APPLICATION
  FOR ORDER
02/16/11 EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR STAY OF ENFORCEMENT OF
  JUDGMENT, MEMO & DECLARATION OF SARINA NELSON
02/10/11 JUDGMENT-UNLAWFUL DETAINER BY COURT
  *POSSESSION ONLY*
02/10/11 WRIT OF POSSESSION OF REAL PROPERTY ISSUED
  CK#99674
01/24/11 NOTICE OF TRIAL DATE RETURNED
01/21/11 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO TRIAL BRIEF
01/14/11 DEFENDANT SARINA NELSON'S TRIAL BRIEF
01/13/11 NTC: COURT TRIAL - SHORT CAUSE (U.D.)
  PREVIOUSLY RESCHEDULED DUE TO COURT
01/05/11 REQUEST TO ENTER DEFAULT
  AS TO ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS
01/05/11 AT-ISSUE MEMORANDUM FILED BY: PLAINTIFF
  REQ NON-JURY TRIAL, 0.5 HOURS
01/05/11 NTC: COURT TRIAL - SHORT CAUSE (U.D.)
12/28/10 ANSWER-UNLAWFUL DETAINER
  SARINA ANN NELSON
12/28/10 SUBSTITUTION OF ATTY; NEW: HELEN A. DUREE
  OLD: SELF REPRESENTED
12/13/10 POS OF SUMMONS/COMPLAINT/...IN POSTING/MAILING
  IN PERSON 11/29/10 AS TO ALL OCCUPANTS
12/13/10 POS OF SUMMONS/COMPLAINT... IN PERSON 11/29/10
  AS TO SARINA NELSON
12/06/10 D'S DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT
12/06/10 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS & AUTHORITIES
12/06/10 NOTICE OF HEARING ON DEMURRER
12/06/10 PRF OF SVC AS TO DEUTSCHE BANK AS TO DEMURRER
  BY MAIL ON 12/06/10
11/12/10 REQUEST FOR ORDER AUTHORIZING SERVICE OF SUMMON
  BY POSTING OR BY PUB CK#97202
10/08/10 NTC: NOTICE OF ACTION PURSUANT TO CCP 1161.2
  UNLAWFUL DETAINER
10/08/10 CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET
10/08/10 COMPLAINT - UNLAWFUL DETAINER - 5 DAY SUMMONS
  ISSUED ($10,000 OR LESS) CK# 95381


Events
Date Time Event Description Dept Code Department/Judge
10/17/11 10:30 FURTHER PROCEEDINGS ON MTN - STAY OF
  ENFRCMNT OF JMT *STAY GRNTD 5/02/11*
  *11CV00922 CMC 10/14-CONTD FOR OUTCOME*

Disposition Date: 10/17/11
STAY OF JMT DENIED; WRIT OF POSS GRNTD

SJH COMMISSIONER JERI M HAMLIN
06/13/11 10:30 CRT'S OSC RE: SET ASIDE JUDGMENT ENTERED
  2/04/11 FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
  *FLD 5/10/11* *CONTD FOR CRT'S REVIEW*

Disposition Date: 06/13/11
CRT'S OSC OFF-CALENDAR

SJH COMMISSIONER JERI M HAMLIN
06/06/11 10:30 CRT'S OSC RE: SET ASIDE JUDGMENT ENTERED
  2/04/11 FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
  *FLD 5/10/2011*

Disposition Date: 06/06/11
HRD; CONTD TO 6/13/2011

SJH COMMISSIONER JERI M HAMLIN
05/02/11 10:30 FURTHER PROCEEDINGS ON MOTION - STAY
  OF ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT

Disposition Date: 05/02/11
HRD; CONTD TO 10/17/11; STAY TO CONTD

SJH COMMISSIONER JERI M HAMLIN
04/04/11 10:30 MOTION - STAY OF ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT

Disposition Date: 04/04/11
MTN DENIED W/OUT PREJUDICE

SJH COMMISSIONER JERI M HAMLIN
01/24/11 10:30 COURT TRIAL - SHORT CAUSE (U.D.)
  PREVIOUSLY RESCHEDULED DUE TO COURT
  HOLIDAY

Disposition Date: 01/24/11
JMT FOR PLTF FOR POSSESSION ONLY

SJH COMMISSIONER JERI M HAMLIN
01/17/11 10:30 COURT TRIAL - SHORT CAUSE (U.D.)

Disposition Date: 01/13/11
VACATED; VACATED DUE TO HOLIDAY

SJH COMMISSIONER JERI M HAMLIN
12/20/10 14:00 D'S DEMURRER
  **FLD 12/06/2010

Disposition Date: 12/20/10
DENIED

___________________________________________________________________

Case Information
Case Number: 11CV00922
Case Title: NELSON, SARINA VS DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONA
Case Type: REAL PROPERTY
Filing Date: 04/05/11
Disposition Date: 10/14/11

DISMISSED ENTIRE ACTION W/0 PREJUDICE


Parties
Name Type Attorney
NELSON, SARINA PLAINTIFF
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST DEFENDANT FOLEY & MANSFIELD, PLLP
REGIONAL TRUSTEES SERVICE CORPORATION DEFENDANT


Actions
Date Action Description
12/19/11 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXPUNGE LIS PENDENS
10/26/11 D'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOT TO EXPUNGE LIS
  PENDENS; DECL OF VICTORIA J TSOONG
10/12/11 [X]PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER [ ]DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT
  CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
10/12/11 PRF OF SVC AS TO CMC STATEMENT
  MLD 10/12/11 FOLEY & MANSFILED
10/05/11 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFT DEUTSCH BANK
  NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE
10/04/11 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER GRANTING DEMURRER TO
  PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT
09/30/11 [ ]PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER [X]DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT
  CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
09/27/11 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S DEMURRER
08/08/11 PLTF'S ADENDUM TO RESPONSE TO DEFT'S DEMURRER
  PLT'S COMPLAINT/PTS & AUTHORITIES
08/08/11 P'S POS RE: ADENDUM TO RESPONSE & DEMURRER BY
  PERS SRVC ON 8/08/11 TO TIFFANY BIRKETT
07/13/11 RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S
  COMPLAINT: MEMO OF P&A
07/13/11 PRF OF SVC AS TO DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST
  OF RESPONSE
06/10/11 DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN
  SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT
06/10/11 DEFENDANT'S NTC OF DEMURRER & DEMURRER TO
  PLTF'S COMPLAINT/MEMO OF PTS/AUTH CK#1632
05/06/11 PRF OF SVC AS TO CASE MANGEMENT
  MLD 5/6/11
05/02/11 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF ACTION - LIS PENDES
04/05/11 CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET
04/05/11 COMPLAINT FOR WRONGFUL EVICTION
  SUMMONS ISSUED
04/05/11 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE
04/05/11 NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE


Events
Date Time Event Description Dept Code Department/Judge
12/02/11 13:00 D'S MOTION TO EXPUNGE LIS PENDENS

Disposition Date: 12/02/11
GRANTED

SPT HONORABLE PETER B. TWEDE
10/14/11 14:30 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disposition Date: 10/14/11
OFF-CALENDAR/CASE DISMISSED

SPT HONORABLE PETER B. TWEDE
07/15/11 13:00 D'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT

Disposition Date: 07/15/11
HEARD; TO BE TAKEN UNDER SUB 8/12

LOSING THE WHITE PAPER

LOSING THE PAPER –MORTGAGE
ASSIGNMENTS, NOTE TRANSFERS AND
CONSUMER PROTECTION

Alan M. White *
ABSTRACT

In this article, I survey the state of the mortgage loan transfer
system, the legal rules that govern it, and the widening gap
between those rules and the practices in the secondary mortgage
market just prior to the 2008 crisis. The review includes some
empirical assessment of the extent of errors and execution problems;  the damage done by “robo-signing;” the Mortgage Electronic Registration System (“MERS”) and note delivery practices; and the extent to which courts will prevent or reverse foreclosure sales based on those errors and problems. I then examine why existing legal structures, for both paper-based and electronic transfers, are not working, and the extent to which they have failed, I also identify the key consumer and investor protection values and interests (finality, transparency, fraud protection, and so forth) that must be addressed by the law governing secondary market transfers of home loans. I conclude by outlining options for reforming the mortgage loan transfer system, including the use of a single document merging the note and mortgage, and a structure for the registration of a single
authoritative electronic version of the mortgage/note and of all
changes in parties to, and terms of, the transaction.

* Professor of Law, Valparaiso Law School. Special thanks to Whitney
Dickison, Christopher Erickson and Anne Zygaldo for their invaluable assistance
with the MERS foreclosure record survey and with additional legal research.

PLEASE READ ENTIRE DOCUMENT HERE: CLICK HERE


Friday, June 15, 2012

Oath Keepers - ATTENTION

Midwest Regional Conference 
Organized by the Ohio Oath Keepers



Ohio Oath Keepers has called a Regional Midwest Conference for the entire Oath Keeper Membership across the nation. Oath Keepers also extends an invitation to all other patriotic groups in Ohio and surrounding states to attend this conference.

This conference is being called as a means to understand the need to create a cohesive effort to stop the tyrannous onslaught to our countries basic ideals. The need to put aside political differences and personal diversities to fight the socialistic uprising within our country has never been more important.

It is essential as individuals and the many diverse groups to arrive at a consensus to stop the usurpation of laws and the destruction of the very existence of this great country. If we do not stand together, this once great country, this land of opportunity, this land of the free and home of the brave, will cease to exist as we know it.
..
SPEAKERS


 Stewart Rhodes, Founder of Oath Keepers

Stewart is the founder and Director of Oath Keepers. He served as a U.S. Army paratrooper until disabled in a rough terrain parachuting accident during a night jump. He is a former firearms instructor and former member of Rep. Ron Paul's DC staff.

Stewart currently writes the monthly Enemy at the Gates column for S.W.A.T. Magazine
Stewart graduated from Yale Law School in 2004, where his paper "Solving the Puzzle of Enemy Combatant Status" won Yale's Miller prize for best paper on the Bill of Rights. He assisted teaching U.S. military history at Yale, was a Yale Research Scholar, and is writing a book on the dangers of applying the laws of war to the American people.


Steven J Frasure, President Ohio Oath Keepers

Dr. James David Manning, PhD

 Dr. James David Manning is chief pastor at the ATLAH World Missionary Church on 123rd Street in New York City. Manning grew up in Red Springs, North Carolina, born to an African American family, and has been at ATLAH since 1981. ATLAH stands for All The Land Anointed Holy, which is Manning's name for Harlem. His congregation, "ATLAH Worldwide Missionary Church" is the former Bethelite Missionary Baptist Church. The church is also the site of the ATLAH Theological Seminary, which offers classes on preaching and prophecy.

Manning graduated from Union Theological Seminary in the City of New York where he was awarded a Master of Divinity. Manning also holds a Doctor of Philosophy degree from his own ATLAH Theological Seminary.

Manning graduated from Union Theological Seminary in the City of New York where he was awarded a Master of Divinity. Manning also holds a Doctor of Philosophy degree from his own ATLAH Theological Seminary, an unaccredited educational institution.


The Honorable Eugene A. Lucci
Lake County Common Pleas Judge
Current Term: 01/06/07-01/05/13

Judge Lucci has served the public and upheld the Constitution for over thirty-four years a police officer, trial attorney and trial judge.

As a police officer, Judge Lucci saw at the ground level how the law worked first hand and served a dual function in both protecting and serving the public.

As an attorney, Judge Lucci learned the important role that attorneys play in searching for truth, justice and fairness for all citizens.

As a trial judge, his 12 years on the bench have given him the ability to directly protect the public and to positively change the course of people's lives forever.

Gary L. Rathbun

Gary L. Rathbun is a licensed principal and registered investment advisor throughout
the United States. He is the President/CEO of Private Wealth Consultants, Ltd., a fee based Wealth Management and consulting firm started in 1981 in Toledo, OH. Private Wealth Consultants, Ltd. specializes in working with affluent individuals as well as closely held business owners in the areas of investment management, wealth preservation & transfer, and overall financial consulting.
Gary and his team specialize in assisting individuals and private companies to realize their goals and objectives. They take a proactive and fiduciary role with their clients and maintain the highest ethical standards in the industry.

He is the co-author of the "Charitable Giving Handbook" published by The National Underwriter, "The Perfect Legacy" , "Wealth Accumulation for Dentists" , "Giving Wisely" and most recently "Wealth Preservation for Physicians."
He has been quoted in and written dozens of articles for numerous publications including The Chronicle of Philanthropy, Private Asset Management, Financial Planning, Business Venture and Probe, National Underwriter & Financial Advisor, Private Wealth Magazine, among others.  

Also, Gary hosts a radio program, syndicated in Ohio, called, "Eye on Your Money", it airs Wednesday & Thursday evenings at 6:05 PM EST on Clear Channel AM 1370, WSPD,WONW 1280 AM, WHLO 640 AM, and WNCO 1340 AM; as well as a daily radio program, "After the Bell". "After the Bell" airs M-F, 4:06 EST on WSPD, 1370 AM.

Dan Johnson   

Dan is 18 years old, an Eagle Scout, and a public speaker. He is a Political Science Major at Bowling Green State University, and speaks a moderate amount of Japanese.  

He was always interested in politics, and was appalled when he saw the direction our country was heading in. His wake-up call was watching a video on the NDAA in November. After doing further research, in late January, he founded PANDA (People Against the National Defense Act). PANDA  is supported by groups across the political spectrum, and is now one of the fastest growing liberty movements in the nation.

Ron Cooper

Ron has been retired 4 years after serving 8 years in the Army and 24 years as an Air Force civilian. Ron also has 17 years in Biblical Creation Science & History along with his ministry which is called ARK Foundation. Ron has an MBA in Finance, BS in Math, Industrial Arts, Military Science, Education, and Business. Ron has taught US Constitution course 7 times in past 27 months.  

Ron will be speaking on the basis and background for Constitutional law and how we should use it, along with comparing the Constitutional legal system to its competition, namely Socialism systems. 
 
When:            June 15, 16, and 17, 2012
  
Where:            The Depot at the Holiday Inn / French Quarter, Perrysburg, Ohio
  
Time and Daily Itinerary:  (Please note this itinerary is subject to change, but will be updated for public knowledge)
  
JUNE 15, 2012
Friday - Oath Keepers Membership and Leadership Meeting (open meeting) Meeting room to be announced.
Evening meeting 6:00 PM - 10: PM
  
JUNE 16, 2012
Saturday -        8:30 AM          Setup
9:00 AM           Doors Open
10:00 AM         Introduction of Event - Words by State President
Introduction of Visiting State Chapter Presidents and or other State Representatives
Introduction of State Officers
10:30 AM         Invocation - Ohio State Chaplain
10:35 AM         1st Speaker
                        11:45 AM         Break
                        12:00               Lunch / Speaker Ron Cooper Constitutional Instructions
                        1:00 PM          Speaker
                        2:00 PM          Speaker
                        3:00 PM          Speaker
4:00 PM          Closing Ceremony
  
JUNE 17, 2012
Sunday -    Departure Breakfast / or lunch - Time and Place to be determined
  
Event tickets are $25.00 in advance, $35.00 at the door. (Ticket includes lunch.)
  
Table setup: to display information, handout fliers, talk to individuals.
$50.00 plus $20.00 lunch ticket - 2 individuals per table.
  

To purchase advance tickets - pay online with PayPal go to www.paypal.com

You must login to your PayPal account or create one. When you are ready to go, click "Send Money" and enter  OhioOathKeepers@gmail email address as the recipient, then enter the amount of money you are sending.  
Keep receipt for your records. Your name will be recorded for admittance at the event. 

If you prefer to pay by check call 419-663-2131 ask for Ryan Sawyer (Ohio Oath Keeper Treasurer).
 
  
Tickets are going quickly, please call now to confirm your spot at this  
important Oath Keeper Event!




HOTEL INFORMATION:

Holiday Inn® - French Quarter
10630 Fremont Pike
Perrysburg, OH 43551
Toll-Free: (888)874-2592 Phone: (419)874-3111 Fax: (419)874-0198
PHYSICAL LOCATION - US State Route 20 and Exit off of I-75 at exit 193

If you plan on staying at the site hotel, please mention Ohio Oath Keepers for negotiated room pricing.
  
We are well within many family entertainment sites and invite everyone to make this a family event as well as an Oath Keeper and like minded organizational gathering.
There are also nearby campgrounds and many other hotels/motels. We are currently negotiating prices for the stay at the French Quarter. 
 




Oath Keepers is growing FAST, but like General Patton, we are outpacing our own supply lines. Your donations are "fuel" for our advance! If you would like to support the Oath Keepers vital mission to teach the current serving about their oath and about the Constitution so they will stand firm and do what is right, and our second mission to remind veterans of their oath and obligations.:

Please click the PayPal image below to donate. 
 



If you would like to mail your donation:

Make checks payable to: OathKeepers

Mail to:
Oath Keepers
5130 S. Fort Apache suite 215
Las Vegas, NV 89148 

This email was sent from an unmonitored email address. If you wish to contact us, please use the contact form on the contact page of our website.